简体版 繁體版 English 한국어
登録 ログイン
ツール

1197 ceの例文

例文モバイル版携帯版

  • The last ruler Jayata-simha was probably defeated by Qutb al-Din Aibak in 1197 CE.
  • In 1197 CE, the Ghurid general Qutb al-Din Aibak launched a southern expedition from Ajmer.
  • Hearing of this, Miyajuq assembled a large force, so Kukya and his allies fled the city as the Khwarazmians approached in 593 H ( 1197 CE ).
  • On 4 February 1197 CE, the Ghurid general Qutb al-Din Aibak invaded Bhima's capital Anahilapataka, and inflicted a massive defeat on the Chaulukyas.
  • He defeated the Chaulukya army on 4 February 1197 CE . The 13th century Muslim historian Hasan Nizami boasts that the Chaulukyas lost 50, 000 men in this battle.
  • According to the medieval Muslim historians, in 1197 CE, the Ghurid general Qutb al-Din Aibak marched to Nahrwala ( that is, the Chalukya capital Anahilapataka ).
  • This sacking of Anahliapataka was witnessed by the Jain scholar Jinapati Suri in 1197 CE . According to Firishta, Qutb al-Din appointed a governor in the Chaulukya capital before leaving for Ajmer.
  • An inscription dated 29 April 1197 CE, found at Belkhara in Mirzapur district, mentions that it was issued under the rule of a feudatory ( " ranaka " ) named Vijayakarna.
  • Jaitgui's last inscription is dated 1196 CE . Different records variously suggest that the first regnal year of his successor Simhana was 1200 CE, 1207 CE or 1210 CE . One inscription of Simhana is dated 1197 CE . But since Jaitugi is credited with appointment of Ganapati as a Kakatiya vassal around 1198 CE, it does not appear that Simhana was the king in 1197 CE . It is possible that Simhana was formally associated with his father's administration as the heir apparent ( " yuvaraja " ).
  • Jaitgui's last inscription is dated 1196 CE . Different records variously suggest that the first regnal year of his successor Simhana was 1200 CE, 1207 CE or 1210 CE . One inscription of Simhana is dated 1197 CE . But since Jaitugi is credited with appointment of Ganapati as a Kakatiya vassal around 1198 CE, it does not appear that Simhana was the king in 1197 CE . It is possible that Simhana was formally associated with his father's administration as the heir apparent ( " yuvaraja " ).