avoid weasel wordsの例文

• Sometimes strong statements are appropriate Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words.
• See Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words.
• Wikipedia has a style guide entitled Avoid weasel words which strongly discourages the use of weasel words.
• BTW, I made some small corrections to the article, per Wikipedia : Verifiability, Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words, and Wikipedia : cleanup.
• I know that the point could have been made a little more tactfully-we have to be careful in these Village Pump discussions to maintain good netiquette and to avoid weasel words.
• In all contexts, it is best to avoid weasel words, which should not be substituted for the tentative tone .-- Talk 06 : 31, 10 September 2006 ( UTC)
• :: Alas, not even 24 hours . . . he came back on and not only hit Talk : Teletubbies but apparently decided to also play with Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words.
• Prose attributions that overstate the support for a position, which engage in value judgements, or which constitute ambiguous or unfalsifiable " weasel words " should be avoided ( See Avoid weasel words ).
• *Avoid weasel words-right in the lead, the article states that " He is believed to have been one of the most skilled swordsmen in history . "-by whom is he believed to be so?
• For advice about dealing with unattributed material when you find it, see Wikipedia : Verifiability, Wikipedia : No original research and Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words which are policy, and Wikipedia : Cite sources, which is a style guide.
• And we want to avoid weasel words so we don't need to say e . g the Times says Sarah is gay, we just say it neutrally and move on . Obina 20 : 41, 2 November 2007 ( UTC)
• I'm not an ED editor or anything-- I only recently became aware of what a big drama ED actually is-- I myself just copied the link from Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words because my essay was on a similar subject.
• Avoid weasel words such as, " Some people say . . . " Instead, find a specific person or group who holds that opinion, mention them by name, and give a citation to some place where they can be seen or heard expressing that opinion.
• Note : A series of proposals have been made to merge WP : Avoid neologisms, WP : Avoid peacock terms, WP : Avoid weasel words, WP : Embedded list, WP : Explain jargon, WP : Layout, WP : Lead section and WP : Technical terms and definitions into other pages.
• It could be a simple misreading of the WP : Neutral point of view and Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words policies, thinking ( incorrectly ) that every time we reference someone, we need to explicitly say who it is in the text .-- talk ) 18 : 29, 29 July 2009 ( UTC)
• "' Comment "'- A few reamining problems : instances of saying past events " would " happen makes the article less definitive and inconsistent with the prevailing tone that past events " did " happen, which is how the entire article should be written . ( see discussion above ) . . . also see Wikipedia : Avoid weasel words.
• If MOS-focused editors are being heavy-handed in applying MOS guidelines, that would seem to me to be a problem of not following the point in Help : Reverting that states " If the edit you are considering reverting can instead be improved ( for example, to avoid weasel words, or to re-phrase in a more neutral way ), then try to reword, rather than reverting . ".
• Some sources ( insert citations here to avoid weasel words ) report that this figure includes up to 15, 000 civilians; however, these sources are unclear as to whether that is included in or in addition to the total POWs from the Pakistan military . " " ) I admit, it's not ideal, but based on the sources we have, I'm not sure there is a better option at the moment.